Covert oppression in South Africa

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Front National

July 11, 20173

Covert oppression in South Africa. Image: FNSA

A few months ago the media reacted with mild amusement when I stated publicly that we only have five years left for self-determination in South Africa – after that the demographics, emigration and negative birthrate, coupled with the murder rate, would render us helpless.

Since then we’ve had another few discriminatory laws against whites published, we’ve had Coligny and Knysna, we’ve had land Distribution debates along with White Monolopy Capital. Suddenly the frog in the carefully heated pot must be feeling the heat.

Covert racism is a discrimination that is disguised and subtle, rather than public or obvious. Concealed in the fabric of society, covert racism discriminates against individuals through often unnoticeable or seemingly passive methods. The liberal will not feel it or see it at first – until it is too late; then they’ll gasp in indignation.

Some forms of structural oppression exist through laws or other highly visible public policies (such as the more than 100 laws, regulations and ordinances prohibiting whites from normal practices in affirmative action, BEE, quotas, tenders, land acquisition).

Other oppressions and racism are more concealed. These include the “transformation” of judges, magistrates, police station commanders, teachers, lecturers, office administrators. it even levels down to waiters in a franchise restaurant group.

Institutional Oppression creates invisible barriers limiting people based on their race or ethnicity. The barriers are only invisible to those “seemingly” unaffected by it.
One of the side-effects of covert oppression and racism is that it more often than not also manifests in overt (open) discrimination where the President, Malema and Maimane can overtly attack the Afrikaner, his language and heritage with impunity. BLF and the Black Management Forum have carte blanche to vilify the white South African; and then…have the audacity to demand apologies from whites!

This of course also manifests in “no-go” areas. It is so commonplace that a white dares not enter a ‘black area”, but traditional white urban areas and farms are under continious attack to scrap trespassing laws and to allow free entrance even on private property.

In South Africa we must be very careful not to confuse inequality with inequity. Being considered as a second-class citizen who must toe-the-line because of a 10:1 majority is discriminatory and racist.

The liberal and politically-correct white will not heed the warning. They did not do so in 1992 and they will not do so in 2017. But hopefully, in a sudden glimpse of intelligence, they can ask:

– Could I tender in 1994? Could my child study medicine in 1994? Could my child get a study loan or bursary in 1994? Could I walk the streets in 1994? Could my husband reach the pinnacle of his career in 1994? Could I drive through Johannesburg’s inner city in 1994?

Civilization and development mean that you pull the have-nots up to your level (like the “dreaded Apartheid government” tried to do); NOT to drag the haves down to a lower level. Only someone with a western value system can understand that. Only someone with an inner desire for achievement can understand how important it is to realise self-determination in time for the western civilization to bring some sense back to the term “freedom and choice”.

Read the original article by Hannes Engelbrecht on Front Nasionaal SA – blad

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail